Perform DR and Data Protection in a Multicloud Environment
NCP-MCI-7.5 · 75 questions
- A team must back up and replicate a multi-VM application on AHV so the related VMs can be snapshotted and failed over together as one recoverable set. Which construct should the administrator create?
- A production VM is protected by a protection domain with local and remote snapshots. An admin must confirm the VM can be recovered if the source cluster and storage are destroyed. Which snapshot must exist at the DR site?
- Your AHV protection domain replicates asynchronously to a second Nutanix cluster. Management requires an RPO of 30 minutes for a group of VMs. Which configuration should you adjust first to control how often recovery points are created?
- A Nutanix administrator configures a protection policy for AHV VMs. Snapshots are scheduled every 15 minutes, and the policy is set to retain four snapshots. What does the retention setting control?
- Your organization snapshots a multi-tier application and needs the web and database VMs to share the same recovery point for consistent recovery. Which Nutanix mechanism coordinates related VMs during snapshot and recovery?
- A Nutanix administrator creates a Protection Domain on the primary AHV cluster and schedules snapshots, but no snapshots appear at the DR cluster. Which action makes the Protection Domain copy snapshots to the DR site?
- A protection domain replicates VMs from AHV Prism Element to a remote Nutanix cluster using async replication. The primary site suffers a storage failure, and you must recover the VMs at the remote site. Which recovery point should you select for the restore?
- A VM is added to an existing protection domain after several snapshot and replication cycles have already run. What is the effect on protection for the newly added VM?
- A financial application uses a protection domain with AHV VMs. Local snapshots support same-day operational recovery, while remote snapshots support disaster recovery with a different RPO and compliance retention. The administrator must design snapshot schedules. Which approach should the administrator choose?
- A protection domain on AHV contains a write-intensive database with a 150 GB/day change rate. The remote site has a 200 Mbps link and an RPO of 4 hours. The administrator must set a snapshot schedule for async replication. Which scheduling approach best balances recovery point and bandwidth?
- A protection domain replicates asynchronously to a second Nutanix cluster. You must prove that recoverable points are still being produced for a planned failover. Which status gives the strongest confirmation?
- A production VM is protected by a protection domain with local snapshots on the primary cluster and remote snapshots replicated to a secondary cluster. During a maintenance window, the primary cluster becomes completely unreachable and cannot serve snapshot data. You need to recover the VM as quickly as possible without waiting for the primary site to come back online. What should you use?
- Three VMs hosting a multi-tier application must be recovered together as a single coordinated set after a local storage fault. You need a Nutanix method that groups the VMs and lets you take and restore them from the same point in time. Which should you use?
- A VM in a protection domain already has a recent snapshot. You take another snapshot, then the VM writes 8 GiB of new data and overwrites 4 GiB of existing blocks. Which capacity outcome should you expect from the new snapshot?
- Your protection domain replicates asynchronously from Site A to Site B. Prism shows the current replication lag as 02:00:00. What does this value indicate about the remote recovery state?
- An administrator edits a protection domain's replication frequency and remote site after several snapshots have already been replicated. What happens to snapshots that existed before the change?
- A team is creating a Nutanix protection domain for a multi-tier application that includes web, application, and database virtual machines. They must ensure that local snapshots and remote replication can recover the application as a coordinated set. How should the virtual machines be grouped into the protection domain?
- A Nutanix admin designs remote capacity for a protection domain replicated to a secondary cluster. The PD contains 40 VMs, daily snapshots retained for 7 days, and the workload reports 150 GB/day change. What should drive the remote storage estimate?
- An administrator plans a four-hour CVM rolling maintenance window on a Nutanix cluster. The current snapshot schedule creates local snapshots every four hours, and a protection domain replicates to a DR cluster every four hours. What should be done before starting maintenance?
- A DR administrator must protect production VMs between two Nutanix clusters. The business can tolerate losing up to 15 minutes of writes, and replication must send only periodic recovery points across a constrained WAN. Which replication mode should be selected?
- A production AHV VM on a Nutanix cluster must replicate to a remote cluster. The current scheduled asynchronous replication gives an RPO of one hour, but the business now needs a much shorter RPO. The WAN has enough bandwidth, but its latency is higher than Metro availability requires. Which protection method should you choose?
- A hospital's patient portal must keep running across two Nutanix sites with AHV and Prism Central. Leadership says any loss of submitted records during a site outage is unacceptable, so the solution must deliver zero RPO for a small group of critical VMs. Which Nutanix availability mode should you configure?
- An administrator must replicate a protection domain to a remote Nutanix site over a WAN link with 80 ms latency. The business tolerates a 15-minute RPO and cannot accept a synchronous commit path. Which replication mode best fits this DR design?
- A protected application must meet a five-minute RPO and a one-hour RTO. After failover, VM startup and application boot take about five minutes. Which replication design best meets the requirements without overprovisioning?
- You add several production AHV VMs to a Nutanix protection domain using async replication. The first replication cycle completes slowly, but later scheduled snapshots finish much faster. The link is healthy and bandwidth is not saturated. What best explains the difference?
- A Nutanix AHV production cluster replicates VMs to a remote site with async snapshot schedules. The app owner now needs recovery point objectives in seconds, but the network cannot support a stretched synchronous Metro deployment. Which replication capability should you use?
- A multi-cluster Nutanix estate uses Metro availability for a set of AHV VMs. During a network test, the remote site becomes unreachable while the protected VMs are actively writing data. Which behavior should the administrator expect?
- A Nutanix administrator configures Metro Availability between two on-premises sites. During a network partition test, both sites can see local CVMs but cannot see the partner site. The administrator wants to prevent split-brain and keep one site authoritative. Which mechanism must be deployed?
- A Nutanix AHV cluster uses NearSync replication for critical VMs to a DR site. During business hours, production VMs show high storage latency and WAN bandwidth spikes, while the DR policy requires an RPO under 30 minutes. Which action best balances production performance with the DR requirement?
- An administrator is preparing to enable Metro availability between two Nutanix AHV clusters in separate data centers. Which requirement must be satisfied before the Metro relationship can be established?
- Before a planned failover, your team must confirm that a protection domain is not lagging or failing. Which feature should you check first to identify replication lag or failure before recovery?
- A protection domain uses async replication with snapshots every 15 minutes. The most recent snapshot replicated 5 minutes after creation. What approximate RPO should you quote?
- An AHV cluster uses NearSync replication to a second Nutanix site. The application owner requires recovery from ransomware and compliance retention for 90 days. The DR team notes NearSync replicas are available but cannot meet the retention goal. What should be added to meet long-term recovery requirements?
- Your Metro Availability domain spans Site A and Site B with a witness. During a power loss, Site A becomes completely unavailable and VMs fail over to Site B without admin action. Later, Site A loses only its Metro link but remains powered on and reachable by its local network. An admin must manually initiate failover. Why did the first event allow automatic failover while the second did not?
- Your AHV clusters in Site A and Site B are configured for Metro Availability with active-active VMs. During maintenance, the inter-site network partitions. You must prevent both sites from continuing to write to the same VMs. Which configuration provides the required protection?
- A production AHV cluster replicates to a remote Nutanix cluster over a constrained WAN. The business requires a 15-minute RPO, and replication traffic must not compete with production VLAN traffic. Which replication path should an administrator select?
- During a planned site failure test, an administrator needs to recover protected AHV VMs from a Nutanix DR relationship that uses asynchronous replication with a 15-minute RPO. Which source provides usable recovery points for the failed site?
- An application uses a NearSync protection domain in Prism Central. After an unexpected site failure, you must tell the app owner what data loss to expect when recovering from the replicated copy. Which statement describes the recovery point objective?
- A three-tier application runs on AHV VMs replicated to a second Nutanix cluster. During a planned failover, the database VM must power on before the application VMs, and a runbook should execute after boot. Which Nutanix DR object should an admin use to orchestrate this multi-VM failover?
- A Nutanix administrator must migrate protected VMs from the production AHV cluster to the DR site during a scheduled maintenance window. The source cluster, CVMs, and replication link are healthy, and the operator wants a controlled switchover with final sync. Which recovery-plan action should be used?
- A recovery plan protects production VMs from Site A to Site B. Site A loses power and is unreachable, but Site B has the latest replicated VMs. You need to bring the production VMs online at Site B as quickly as possible. Which action should you take?
- Your recovery plan fails over a protected VM group from the primary AHV cluster to a disaster recovery cluster after a site outage. Which recovery source does Nutanix use to power on the VMs?
- During a planned failback after an async replication outage, what must be true at the original site before the recovery plan can safely reverse replication?
- A Nutanix DR runbook must fail over a three-tier application: database VMs, application VMs, and web VMs. The app team says web servers connect to the application tier, which connects to the database. Which start order should the runbook enforce during failover?
- A recovery plan moves protected VMs from production to a DR site, but after failover the VMs cannot reach the DR application tier because their NICs retain production network settings. What should be configured in the recovery plan?
- A Nutanix administrator must validate that a DR recovery plan can restore a set of AHV VMs after a site outage. Production workloads must continue running while the test is performed. Which action should you take?
- During a planned failover, a recovery plan stops before completing all steps. You must determine which step failed or remained incomplete and why. Which source gives the most direct evidence?
- An application has a 15-minute RTO and uses database, middleware, and web VMs. Database must be available before middleware, and middleware before web. Which recovery plan orchestration best aligns the failover with the RTO?
- A three-tier app on AHV uses a database, app server, and web server. During failover, the database must start before the app and web tiers. You need the recovery plan to start the VMs together in the correct order. What should you do?
- During a planned failover of a multi-VM SQL application in a Nutanix protection domain, the admin needs the recovered VMs to reflect the same transaction state. What should be configured before the failover?
- A production app fails over to the DR cluster after a site outage. The recovery plan lists several remote snapshots created at different times. The admin wants to honor the RPO while avoiding a stale recovery point. Which snapshot should be selected?
- A DR team must restore a failed app to a recent point after a site outage. They also need a single workflow that powers on VMs in order, remaps networks, and notifies owners. In this Nutanix design, which capability supplies the point-in-time recovery targets that the workflow consumes?
- Your team performs a planned failover of a Nutanix AHV application. After target VMs power on, you must run a validation script and then start a dependent application tier in a fixed order. Which recovery element should carry these scripted startup and validation steps?
- During a planned failover in Prism Central, a three-tier application recovery plan powers on the web and app VMs before the database VMs, causing failed health checks. You need the recovery plan to control VM power state and startup sequence without changing replication. What should you configure?
- An administrator tests a recovery plan for AHV VMs replicated to a second Nutanix cluster. The DR site uses different VLANs, and after failover some VMs stay on production VLANs that are not reachable there. Which action ensures each VM attaches to the correct DR network during failover?
- After a recovery plan fails over a multi-tier application from the production cluster to the DR cluster, the administrator sees the plan status as Completed. Which validation must be performed before declaring the failover successful?
- A team must prove its Nutanix recovery plan works before a DR test window, but production VMs must remain online. Which action validates the plan without causing a production outage?
- A Nutanix AHV cluster uses asynchronous replication to a DR site, but auditors require VM-level point-in-time copies retained for seven years. What should you design to meet this requirement?
- A financial application requires a 1-hour RPO and must retain one monthly copy for 12 months for audit. Which Nutanix backup design should you recommend?
- An admin must size an external backup target for a protection domain whose VMs are protected with Nutanix snapshots every 6 hours, retained for 30 days. Assuming the first snapshot's used blocks are already accounted for, which inputs most directly determine the additional target capacity needed?
- A Nutanix administrator must keep 90 days of point-in-time copies in an external backup repository for compliance, while DR replication to a second site must retain only 7 days of remote snapshots. Which design decision satisfies the 90-day requirement?
- An administrator must protect production AHV VMs with Nutanix backups, but users report slow response during backup jobs. Which scheduling change best reduces production I/O contention?
- A production VM was deleted, and another VM's application disk is corrupted. The cluster uses a protection domain with async replication to a DR site and scheduled backups to an external backup server. Which action recovers both VMs while keeping the DR copy intact?
- A Nutanix admin protects a multi-VM web/database workload on AHV. The external backup tool must create application-consistent backups, and related VMs must be captured together. What should be configured?
- Your protection domain keeps local snapshots for 30 days, remote snapshots for 14 days, and external backup copies for 90 days. A compliance audit now requires every recovery point to remain available for 60 days. Which change resolves the conflict?
- An admin is designing backup for AHV VMs on a Nutanix cluster. The backup tool must retain snapshots and be supported during AOS upgrades. Which approach meets this requirement?
- A Nutanix admin protects production VMs with protection-domain snapshots and backups to an external target. Management requires backup copies to remain undeletable for 90 days even if attackers compromise administrator accounts. Which retention design best satisfies this requirement?
- A Nutanix cluster uses backups for 90-day recovery. Management now wants copies kept for five years, but only for occasional audits, at lower cost. What placement should you choose?
- After an external backup solution reports nightly jobs successful for a protection domain, an administrator must prove the backups are actually usable for recovery. Which backup-health control best demonstrates recoverability?
- An administrator backs up a three-tier application whose web, app, and database VMs must be recovered as one consistent set. Which backup approach should be used?
- A Nutanix administrator must protect a Prism Central-managed cluster against loss of the entire production site while preserving 30 days of application-consistent restore points. Local snapshots already exist on the cluster. Which action best satisfies the site-disaster and retention goal?
- A Nutanix administrator is designing backup integration for a protection domain. The business requires that a restore can reach any point within the last 30 days, while replication handles site failover. What should drive backup retention depth?
- A 12 TB AHV workload has an average daily change rate of 3%. A backup policy retains 20 days of incremental backups. Which calculation estimates average backup bandwidth across the retention period, not peak window throughput?
- An administrator manages Nutanix AHV VMs backed up to an external target with a 30-day retention policy. Before the next DR audit, you need to prove that backups are usable and that recovery plans meet RTO assumptions. What should you do?
- A Nutanix administrator protects a set of AHV VMs in a protection domain. Compliance requires one monthly snapshot to be retained for 12 months, but snapshots are being deleted after seven days. Which action enforces the required governance?