Coaching the ART
RTE · 39 questions
- The newly formed city permits portal ART is polite in every room, asks the RTE what the "usual" working agreements are, and still cannot say who speaks for architecture in ART Sync. Which group-dynamics stage is the ART showing?
- Two sprints after launch, the county tax-assessment ART erupts over who owns appeal-letter priorities and whether architects may override team estimates. Several people call the ART a failure. How should the RTE read this?
- The municipal transit fare-system ART now has explicit working agreements, ART Sync runs to a shared agenda, and teams stop relitigating the same process fights every week. Which evolution is the RTE seeing?
- The public-health immunization registry ART hits PI objectives with a stable forecast, raises disagreements in the room, and leaves with a decision instead of a parking-lot grudge. Which pattern should the RTE name?
- Mid-PI, leadership moves half the library consortium digital-services ART onto other trains. The remaining people suddenly argue about basic norms that had been settled. Why did the dynamics regress?
- ART Sync on the parks reservation and facility ART ends in ten quiet minutes of "no issues," yet reservation defects and ranger workarounds explode in the hallway afterward. What group-dynamics risk should the RTE name?
- On the multi-location wastewater SCADA modernization ART, the plant-site cohort and the downtown IT cohort hold separate huddles, vote as blocs in PI Planning, and skip mixed-team refinement. What should the RTE treat this as?
- Every Inspect and Adapt, the 911 CAD/RMS integration ART pins missed objectives on the same interface team, then leaves the ART's policies, dependencies, and test environments unchanged. What dysfunctional pattern is this?
- After a strong PI, the school-district student-information ART cancels its improvement backlog, skips the Problem-Solving Workshop "because we already won," and reuses last PI's unexamined working agreements. What should the RTE watch for?
- Two new Business Owners join the state DMV licensing ART and immediately reopen PI operating agreements the teams treated as settled. What should the RTE anticipate?
- A Scrum Master on the city housing-voucher ART asks the RTE to just tell the team what to do so they can finish the PI. What should the RTE do first?
- The county elections systems ART RTE meets 1:1 with a Scrum Master who is stuck on how to improve Coach Sync. Which structured coaching conversation pattern should the RTE use?
- On the municipal utilities billing ART, the only coaching feedback Scrum Masters receive is a vague annual review. How should the RTE change that pattern?
- Rumors say the public works work-order ART Scrum Master is running a chaotic ART Sync. What should the RTE do before coaching that facilitator?
- A team on the airport operations digital ART is stuck on a gate-display dependency and wants the RTE to solve it in the next hour. How should the RTE apply a coach-as-mirror stance?
- Coaching notes on the court case-management ART list only defects in Scrum Master facilitation and never mention what already works. What should the RTE change?
- A fire-EMS records ART Scrum Master asks for help thinking through a tense System Demo. The RTE’s reflex is to tell a long war story about past demos. When should the RTE coach versus mentor?
- 1:1 coaching on the social-services eligibility ART produces only safe, empty answers because people fear being blamed in ART Sync. What should the RTE treat as the coaching precondition?
- The RTE informally coaches Scrum Masters on the open-data and civic-engagement ART, but no coaching goals are written down and follow-through fades. What should the RTE establish?
- The fleet telematics ART RTE only coaches Scrum Masters after a missed PI Objective or a heated ART Sync. What cadence should replace that pattern?
- The city permits portal ART workshop starts with no posted purpose, agenda, or desired outcomes, and people argue about why they are in the room. What should the RTE apply first?
- A debate on valuation methods in the county tax-assessment ART working session has already consumed the agenda with no decision. What facilitation techniques should the RTE apply?
- After municipal transit fare-system ART workshops, people leave unsure whether a decision was made, who made it, or how dissent was handled. What should the RTE make explicit?
- On the public-health immunization registry ART, a few voices dominate every working session and quieter epidemiologists never speak. Which inclusive facilitation technique should the RTE use?
- The library consortium digital-services ART tries to brainstorm catalog ideas and lock a decision in the same unstructured block of time, and the room stalls. What should the RTE separate?
- In a parks reservation and facility ART working session, two groups lock into opposing positions on a booking-rule change and stop listening. How should the RTE facilitate the conflict?
- Virtual sessions for the wastewater SCADA modernization ART devolve into muted cameras and a single speaker. Which facilitation techniques should the RTE apply?
- While facilitating a 911 CAD/RMS integration ART design workshop that requires neutrality, the RTE begins arguing for a preferred vendor architecture. What should the RTE do?
- Action items from the school-district student-information ART workshops disappear by the next week, and nobody can name an owner. How should the RTE close each facilitated session?
- A large state DMV licensing ART forum is too big for a single-circle discussion, and ideas die before they reach the whole room. What large-group facilitation pattern should the RTE use?
- A city director wants a housing-voucher ART launched tomorrow, but no operational value stream has been identified. What should the RTE insist on first?
- Leaders staff the county elections systems ART with a random mix of teams that do not share a value stream or mission. What create-ART correction should the RTE recommend?
- Leaders are ready to launch the municipal utilities billing ART but have not named an RTE, Product Management, System Architect, or Business Owners. What create-ART step is missing?
- Teams on the new public works work-order ART are sent into the first PI Planning with no SAFe role or event training. What create-ART preparation should the RTE require?
- The airport operations digital ART has named teams and a date for first PI Planning, but no one has checked Feature-backlog readiness, cross-terminal collaboration tooling, or whether virtual rooms and logistics are booked. What should the RTE do before launch?
- A court case-management ART has a value stream, staffed roles, and trained teams, yet no first PI Planning event is on the court calendar. Which create-ART step is still missing?
- Fire chiefs, records clerks, and city executives are surprised when the new fire-EMS records ART starts two-week iterations and a System Demo, because nobody explained how the train would operate. Which create-ART step did the RTE skip?
- After the social-services eligibility ART's first PI Planning, the launch coach departs with no plan for who will coach teams, Scrum Masters/Team Coaches, or the RTE through later PIs. What create-ART step is still required?
- City leaders forming an open-data and civic-engagement ART list fifty names on a roster but never define which Agile teams exist, what each can deliver, or where boundaries sit. Which create-ART step is missing?