The fleet-telematics team uses sarcasm as the default in reviews. What should the coach name instead?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Sarcasm is a joke-shaped shield. The fleet-telematics review needs a specific, respectful observation about the work. "Just kidding" is not a quality practice.
Full Explanation
When a fleet-telematics team uses sarcasm as the default in reviews, the coach should name respectful, specific observations about the work rather than sarcasm. Sarcasm creates fear, muddies technical feedback about vehicles and safety data, and makes people hide mistakes that cities cannot afford on the road. Sharper sarcasm so people "take a joke" under pressure escalates harm and confuses toughness with quality discipline. A silent review with no comments removes sarcasm by removing feedback entirely, which starves learning about regressions and data quality. An RTE scorecard rating how funny the sarcasm was trivializes a team health problem at train level instead of fixing it. Exam caveat: SASM conflict and team health coaching favors specific respectful feedback; sarcasm culture and silence-as-cure are wrong concepts on advanced team-coach items. Operational check: interrupt sarcastic patterns in review, model a specific observation about the change under review, update the working agreement on feedback language, and check whether review comments become more actionable and less personal. Re-sample review tone after two iterations on the telematics team and escalate persistent contempt as a team-health performance issue if it continues to block honest engineering discussion.