After the open-data and civic-engagement ART posts its highest SAFe competency-assessment scores yet, the steering committee throws a celebration even though citizen wait time and dataset freshness have not moved. What should the RTE emphasize about measure-and-grow?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A high maturity score with stale open-data wait times is like a firehouse bragging about drill-card grades while the engines still take eight minutes to roll. Measure-and-grow exists to move citizen outcomes, not to hang a trophy on the wall. The number is a signal, not the parade.
Full Explanation
SAFe measure-and-grow uses competency assessments to reveal gaps and to aim improvement experiments. Scores are leading indicators of capability, not the value the ART delivers to residents. When wait time and dataset freshness stay flat, celebrating the number is score theater. The RTE keeps ART leaders converting assessment insight into measurable outcome movement rather than treating the radar chart as the result.