During planning for a parks restroom renovation, the sponsor announces effort hours from the council dais without consulting the crew. What is the sound CAPM correction?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Estimates come from the folks who do the work, not from the podium. Sponsors fund and decide; they should not invent hours from the dais. Let the team and PM build the estimate, then review it with sponsorship.
Full Explanation
Effort estimating is a project team and project manager practice grounded in understanding the work; sponsors should not dictate hours by fiat from the council dais. During parks restroom renovation planning, that is the sound CAPM correction for credible baselines. Saying sponsors should invent all estimates because they control the budget narrative fails by concept: budget authority does not create technical estimating accuracy for crew hours. Saying effort estimating is illegal on public-sector projects fails because public projects estimate effort routinely within procurement and labor rules. Saying only the mayor’s office may enter hours into the scheduling tool fails because tool access is not a substitute for proper estimating roles and can create political estimates disconnected from crew reality. Exam caveat: CAPM estimating guidance places effort development with those closest to the work, while sponsors approve budgets and priorities rather than inventing durations. Operational check: facilitate crew-based effort estimates, reconcile them to the sponsor’s funding envelope through scope or phasing choices, and avoid publishing dais-announced hours as the baseline without team validation.