A library director wants privacy-handling outcomes that do not appear in the ILS vendor slides. What should the instructor do?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
The director's privacy goal is a side dish, not a reason to throw out dinner. Keep the vendor ILS objectives on the table and plan a short add-on for the extra outcome. Ignoring either the director or the published course is the miss.
Full Explanation
Organizational sponsors sometimes request outcomes that vendor slides omit. A library director’s privacy-handling goals that are absent from ILS vendor materials should be treated as extra organizational learning outcomes and planned as add-ons without dropping the published ILS objectives. That approach honors both the purchased design and the civic privacy need. Skipping published ILS objectives to focus only on privacy compromises the original course design and leaves staff untrained on the system they must operate. Claiming vendor slides can never be supplemented under any circumstance freezes planning and ignores legitimate organizational outcomes CTT+ expects instructors to accommodate when they do not destroy design integrity. Launching a full instructional-systems-design project to replace the vendor course overreacts to an add-on need and confuses customization of an offering with building a new curriculum. Exam caveat: distinguish extra organizational outcomes (plan around them) from requests that would replace core objectives (refuse or escalate redesign). Operational check: map the director’s privacy outcomes to a short lawful add-on, keep the published ILS objectives on the agenda, and document both in the session plan before delivery.