After a county permitting sandbox lab, the instructor needs evidence of knowledge and skill transfer. What should the instructor gather?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Feelings are one snapshot, not the whole album. Pull the sandbox fields that are right or wrong, and ask the supervisor how ready folks look to transfer. Vibes alone do not prove the job skill moved.
Full Explanation
After a county permitting sandbox lab, evidence of knowledge and skill transfer should include correct sandbox field entries plus the supervisor’s view of transfer confidence. CTT+ evaluation gathers performance evidence and informed judgments about transfer—not vibes alone. Correct field entries show skill in the practice environment; a supervisor’s transfer confidence adds workplace-context signal without replacing the sandbox proof. Relying only on a show of hands about confidence fails evidence standards because self-reported feeling is not demonstrated entry accuracy. Relying only on the county attorney’s opinion of vendor courseware fails learner-performance focus; materials review is not proof clerks can permit correctly. Relying only on whether the room felt energetic fails validity entirely: climate energy is not knowledge or skill transfer. Exam caveat: combine authentic work-sample evidence with informed transfer input; neither smiles nor legal review of slides substitutes for correct entries. Operational check: export or screenshot graded sandbox fields against the checklist, ask the supervisor for a structured transfer-confidence note tied to those skills, and file both with the course evaluation before claiming clerks are ready for the live permitting counter.