A county needs clear oversight for IT security direction across departments. Which option best identifies governance structures that decide and oversee that direction?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Somebody has to own the steering wheel—county boards, security committees, or designated government entities, whether authority is centralized or pushed out to departments. Chat threads and suggestion boxes are noise, not governance. Vendor roadmaps without internal ownership leave the county along for the ride.
Full Explanation
Security governance structures include boards, committees, and governmental entities that set direction and accountability, with models that may be centralized or decentralized. Informal chats, anonymous boxes, or unowned vendor plans lack decision authority and oversight. Identifying who decides security direction is essential for municipal program management.