After the PI System Demo and measures, the parks ART ignores that evidence and picks a pet peeve. How should the Scrum Master / Team Coach ground problem selection?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A pet peeve is a pebble in someone's shoe, not the PI's evidence. Parks just showed a demo and measures. Pick the problem from that data, not from whoever complained first.
Full Explanation
Problem selection in Inspect and Adapt is grounded in the PI System Demo and the quantitative and qualitative measures just reviewed. Pet peeves, loudest-voice picks, and "creative" workshops that ignore data disconnect improvement from what the PI actually revealed. The Scrum Master / Team Coach keeps the parks ART on that evidence. The workshop then analyzes a problem the ART has already seen, not an unmeasured gripe.