The PI System Demo on the transit ART is a relay of team-by-team slides instead of working software. What should the Scrum Master / Team Coach insist on as part of Inspect and Adapt?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A slide relay is a talent show, not a train. Riders care whether the pieces work together. The PI System Demo should show an integrated increment, not twelve decks.
Full Explanation
The PI System Demo shows the integrated increment so stakeholders see combined value. A transit ART demo that is a team-by-team slide relay without working software fails transparency and integration learning. The Scrum Master / Team Coach insists on demonstrating integrated rider-facing capability, not credit slides. Riders do not experience slide decks.
Keeping the slide relay so each team claims credit without integrating hides integration risk. Skipping the PI System Demo to jump to problem-solving removes shared evidence. Having the RTE narrate a status deck while teams stay at boards substitutes reporting for demo.
Exam caveat: integrated working system is the demo standard at I&A. Operational check: rehearse one integrated transit path end-to-end before I&A; cut team slide relays.
Municipal ARTs feel Inspect and Adapt choices as safer shelter intake, fairer elections, cleaner water data, and clearer permits for the public. Keep facilitation transparent, include the whole Agile Team, and verify improvement items enter real backlogs with owners and check dates. After the event, confirm the next iteration planning agenda references the agreed experiments so civic delivery actually changes.