A director on the elections team frames dissent about a PI risk as disloyalty. How should the Scrum Master / Team Coach reframe that dissent?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Calling an elections risk “disloyal” is like punishing the smoke alarm for making noise. Empiricism needs people to inspect what they see. The Team Coach reframes dissent as inspection, not a loyalty test.
Full Explanation
Lean-Agile empiricism depends on transparent inspection of risks and results. Framing elections-team dissent as disloyalty shuts down the information the PI needs. Silencing people, routing comments to HR as insubordination, or collapsing the Product Owner role into the director keeps a positional, loyalty-based frame. The Scrum Master / Team Coach reframes dissent as required inspection so the conflict can improve the plan.