A library digital-archives bucket uses versioning. Storage Lens and CUR show large spend from incomplete multipart uploads and old noncurrent versions that are never restored. Which storage cost cleanup best recovers that spend?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Incomplete multipart junk and dusty noncurrent versions quietly rent space forever. Lifecycle rules that abort multiparts and expire noncurrent versions are the cleanup crew. Transfer Acceleration and turning off encryption don’t fix that bill.
Full Explanation
S3 Lifecycle can abort incomplete multipart uploads and expire or transition noncurrent versions, which directly attacks common versioning and upload-failure storage waste highlighted by Storage Lens and CUR. Disabling encryption or inventing RRS-style moves does not address those classes of orphaned storage; Transfer Acceleration affects transfer performance/cost, not stored incomplete parts or noncurrent version sprawl.