Before PI Planning, the parks reservation and facility ART cancels its group ROAM workshop and accepts an AI risk-score pack as the official program risks. What should the RTE do?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A score pack is a weather app, not the huddle that decides whether to move the picnic. Parks still need the room to Resolved, Owned, Accepted, or Mitigated each risk. Do not let the model cancel ROAM.
Full Explanation
AI risk scores may inform discussion but must not replace facilitated group ROAM. When the parks reservation and facility ART cancels its ROAM workshop and accepts an AI risk-score pack as the official program risks before PI Planning, the RTE should restore facilitated group ROAM. Accepting scores as final because automation is “more objective” than Business Owners removes ownership and context. Skipping ROAM for parks work on the assumption recreation systems have no PI risks is false comfort. Handing risk ownership solely to the AI vendor’s success manager outsources ART risk management. Exam caveat: using scores as a conversation starter inside ROAM is fine; replacing the conversation is not. Operational check: reinstate the parks ROAM session, bring the score pack as one input, assign Owned/Mitigated/Accepted/Resolved with real owners, and publish that board for PI Planning. Keep the civic mission visible when applying the technique so resident-facing outcomes stay the measure of success. In municipal ART practice, capture the rationale in facilitation notes so future coaches inherit the same standard. Re-validate after the next PI cadence event that the same control still fits current civic constraints.