Three Scrum Teams will demo a transit real-time-arrivals product. Each team scheduled its own isolated demo with a different stakeholder group. What should the Product Owner coordinate instead?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Three private demos of one transit app is three people describing different pieces of the same bus. Riders experience one product. Get stakeholders in one Review looking at the integrated Increment.
Full Explanation
Stakeholders need to inspect the integrated product Increment to give feedback that can adapt a single Product Backlog. When three Scrum Teams demo a transit real-time-arrivals product with each scheduling its own isolated demo for a different stakeholder group, the Product Owner should coordinate one Sprint Review where stakeholders inspect the integrated transit Increment, not only silo demos. Riders experience one product; fragmented demos hide integration gaps and produce conflicting signals.
Three isolated demos so each team can showcase its component without integration risk deliberately avoid the inspection that matters. A recorded slide tour that replaces live inspection of the working product removes empiricism. A Scrum-of-Scrums status meeting that leadership attends instead of a Review is coordination theater, not Sprint Review.
One integrated arrivals Review prevents stakeholders from blessing three half-truths about the same transit product.
Exam caveat: PSPO II multi-team Review inspects the integrated Increment; component demos and SoS status are not substitutes.
Operational check: schedule one arrivals Sprint Review of the integrated Increment, invite the stakeholder groups together, and treat team walkthroughs as optional prep only.