Transit real-time info, curbside parking, and paratransit scheduling share a city strategy of equitable access to getting around, but they serve different users and cadences. How should the Product Owner align them?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Three buses on one route map is not the same as welding the buses into one vehicle. Real-time info, parking, and paratransit can share a "get around town" strategy without becoming one backlog. Fake merges just hide three different products under one ranking.
Full Explanation
Related municipal products should align to shared strategic outcomes without collapsing distinct products, users, and cadences into a single backlog. One mega-backlog creates false control and starves specialized ordering. A PMO feature list or forced identical Sprint Goals is coordination theater, not Product Ownership. Loose alignment of Product Goals to the citywide access strategy preserves empiricism per product.