A gaming platform for teenagers deploys a Foundry-hosted assistant to help players build in-game strategies. Legal review requires the assistant to be especially strict about refusing any content related to self-harm and sexual content, while normal violence discussion common to the game, such as battle tactics, can remain at default sensitivity. (Select TWO.) Which two content filter categories should the team configure to their strictest severity threshold?

The correct choices are the sexual-content category and the self-harm category. Legal review specifically called out self-harm and sexual content as areas requiring especially strict handling for a platform used by teenagers, so those two content filter categories should be configured to their strictest severity threshold. The violence category is incorrect because the scenario explicitly states that ordinary violence discussion tied to gameplay, such as battle tactics, should remain at the default sensitivity rather than being tightened further. The hate-speech category is incorrect because the scenario gives no indication that hate-related content needs escalation beyond its default configuration; while it remains a real content filter category worth monitoring, nothing in this situation calls for raising it to its strictest setting alongside the two categories legal specifically flagged. Configuring content filters per category, rather than applying one blanket severity level, lets a team tighten exactly the categories a scenario requires while leaving unrelated categories at a level appropriate to normal use of the platform, such as competitive gameplay discussion.