University faculty want a recap and follow-up tasks from meetings they already hold in Teams. A proposal would build a custom portal where faculty upload a recording before any recap appears. What should the architect propose?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Faculty are already in the meeting, so you do not send them to a new front door with a recording in hand. You propose the Microsoft 365 agent that recaps the Teams meeting and drafts the follow-ups. A portal that waits for an upload adds a chore the meeting already finished.
Full Explanation
When people already work in Microsoft 365 and the job is one that agent already does, propose that agent rather than a new place to work. Faculty hold the meeting in Teams and want a recap plus follow-up tasks, which is what the Microsoft 365 agent provides for that meeting, so the proposal is to use it. A custom portal where faculty upload a recording inserts a step the Teams meeting does not need and builds a second product for a result the existing agent produces. A public site that cannot see the meeting pushes faculty to paste a transcript, which drops the live meeting and adds a separate channel. A custom model trained on last year's minutes has no connection to the meeting that just ended and will recap a year that is already over. Exam caveat: propose the Microsoft 365 agent for this meeting job. Build something custom when the channel or the process sits outside what that agent covers. Operational check: hold a test meeting in Teams and confirm the recap and the follow-up tasks come from the Microsoft 365 agent without anyone uploading a recording to a portal.