A customer wants its AI governance programme to work the same way in five years, regardless of staff turnover. What should the programme rely on?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A programme that only works because of who's in the room isn't a programme - it's a habit that leaves when they do. You need documented ownership, policies, workflows, and evidence so governance is a defined structure, not tribal knowledge.
Full Explanation
Documented ownership, policies, workflows and evidence is correct because a documented structure survives staff changes; it does not depend on any individual's memory or presence. That durability is exactly what ownership, policy, workflow and evidence definitions provide.
The answer about retaining the same small group of experts indefinitely so institutional knowledge never leaves is incorrect because depending on specific people to stay indefinitely is not a durable strategy and fails the moment they leave.
The answer about keeping the governance process undocumented so it can adapt informally as needed is incorrect because an undocumented process cannot be consistently followed or audited, and 'adapting informally' is another way of describing inconsistent practice.
The answer about relying on new hires to independently infer the expected process by observing colleagues is incorrect because expecting new staff to infer process by observation produces exactly the team-by-team divergence governance is meant to prevent.
For the exam, tie durability of a governance programme to documentation, not to specific people.