You launched an agentic workflow to migrate 150 help-center articles. Mid-run you notice it is mislabeling HIPAA-related pages and you want to steer it without losing progress. The run shows live logs, pause, and feedback controls. How should you interact with the agentic workflow while it is running?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
You stay in control by catching drift before it spreads. Steering is like pausing to reread the map, then continuing with confidence. Pause, guide, and keep watching until the run is done.
Full Explanation
Pausing the run is the right way to stop further HIPAA mislabeling while preserving checkpointed progress. Live logs help you pinpoint where classification diverged; corrected guidance through feedback realigns the workflow, and monitoring after resume lets you verify that the fix holds through completion. Continuing to track live logs and send feedback without pausing may seem like a reasonable streaming-oversight approach, but the agent can keep producing mislabeled pages while the correction is in flight, so the run is not stabilized before steering. Pausing to inspect logs and then discarding progress to restart all 150 articles can identify the errors, but it wastes time and compute by throwing away partial work when the goal is to retain progress. Pausing, diagnosing, correcting, and resuming without further monitoring follows the right recovery steps but leaves late regressions in sensitive HIPAA handling unseen. An exam caveat: phrases such as “without losing progress” and “while it is running” rule out post-hoc batch fixes and full restarts, even though both can be common in practice. As a practical check, confirm the pause checkpoint persisted, verify that the logs acknowledge the feedback, and spot-check the next HIPAA decisions after resuming.