A draft WLAN risk plan proposes to 'accept WEP forever' with no isolation and no executive signature. What should the plan require instead?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
“Accept WEP forever” with no isolation and no signature is not risk management—it is giving up in invisible ink. Either isolate and get an executive on the residual risk, or retire the crypto. Sticky notes and hidden SSIDs are not acceptance.
Full Explanation
Formal residual-risk acceptance for critical WLAN weaknesses requires documented leadership approval and compensating controls such as isolation when temporary exceptions remain. Silent perpetual acceptance of WEP, security-through-obscurity of the SSID, or unbounded deferral without controls fails risk-management standards for CWSP Domain 2.