A city CIO asks why Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz planning differs from legacy 2.4 GHz densification. Which statement is most accurate at expert depth?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
6 GHz is the clean new highway that doesn't travel as far through brick — great lanes, shorter trips. Plan denser APs and don't copy-paste your 2.4 GHz map. It doesn't magically out-punch concrete.
Full Explanation
Higher-frequency 6 GHz signals experience greater free-space path loss and typically poorer penetration than 2.4 GHz, while often enjoying less legacy interference. Expert 6E planning therefore revisits AP density, power, and validation rather than cloning 2.4 GHz counts. Claims that 6 GHz always outranges 2.4 GHz through concrete contradict propagation physics.