A city food-truck-permit tester attaches a vendor sketch; the generated acceptance criteria include “skip health-sticker if the truck is electric,” which is not in the ordinance. Security later says the sketch was tainted input. What should the tester conclude?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A sketch that smuggles a fake rule into the acceptance criteria is request manipulation in action. Believe the ordinance, not the glittery extra line. Cross-check every generated criterion to the real test basis.
Full Explanation
Hallucinated or disrupted testware after untrusted multimodal input is a classic request-manipulation symptom. The tester mitigation is to verify acceptance criteria against the authoritative ordinance or other test basis, not to accept the model’s inventions. Distinguishing this from context manipulation or rating poisoning keeps the response focused.