A community cider-press booking lead wants generated cases to go straight into the nightly run with no stop. Which process guideline belongs in the GenAI testing strategy?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Generated cases are like fresh cider — taste before you bottle the whole batch. Quality gates with review of generated testware are a required process guideline. Skipping straight into the nightly run skips the strategy’s safety stop.
Full Explanation
A GenAI testing strategy includes process guidelines for quality gates, specifically review of generated testware before it is relied upon. That is strategy-level governance for a community cider-press booking lead who wants generated cases to go straight into the nightly run with no stop. Automatic promotion of all generated cases to production without checks rejects the quality-gate guideline and invites fluent but wrong civic cases into the suite. Treating hallucination detection catalogs as the entire Chapter 5 strategy collapses strategy into Chapter 3 detection lists and misses broader governance. Replacing strategy guidelines with a single personal chatbot subscription is shadow-prone and not organizational quality-gate policy. Exam caveat: this is strategy-level review-before-reliance, not a catalog of Chapter 3 detection techniques. Operational check: insert a mandatory review gate so cider-press cases are checked by a person before nightly reliance, and refuse automatic unreviewed promotion. Keep civic testware subject to the same review discipline you would apply to human-authored packs. On the written exam, prefer syllabus terminology over vendor marketing language or lab choreography.