A municipal rain-garden inspection pack is drafted in a personal GenAI helper even though the city requires AI processing only under approved instruments. Which shadow-AI risk is illustrated?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
City rules are like trail markers — you stay on the approved path or you are off-policy. Drafting inspection packs in a personal helper when only approved processing is allowed creates compliance and regulatory risk. That is a named shadow-AI consequence, not a metrics or window-size issue.
Full Explanation
Shadow AI introduces compliance and regulatory risk when testers process work outside the organization’s approved AI instruments and policies. The exam item recalls that risk category; it does not re-examine specific frameworks from Chapter 3. Metrics, context windows, and community support are strategy or selection concerns, not the compliance consequence of unapproved use.