A client's authorized VR services are being wrongly delayed despite…

Question

A client's authorized VR services are being wrongly delayed despite repeated follow-up. Which advocacy referral is most appropriate?

Accepted Answer

Refer to the Client Assistance Program (CAP) for advocacy regarding VR service rights and delays — When VR stalls in the wrong ways, you are not stuck whispering into the void. CAP—the Client Assistance Program—exists for exactly this kind of rights-and-delays advocacy. Refer early; document along the way.

Answer

Advise the client to abandon VR permanently and stop documenting concerns

Answer

Tell the client that no external advocacy exists for VR disputes

Answer

Recommend falsifying urgency criteria on applications to jump the queue

A client's authorized VR services are being wrongly delayed despite repeated follow-up. Which advocacy referral is most appropriate?

Short Explanation

Full Explanation