Permit clerks export license rows to a spreadsheet, fix misspelled business names locally, and never write the corrections back to the licensing system. What data-quality anti-pattern is this?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Fixing names in a personal export is like painting over a crack in a photocopy—the real wall still has the crack. Local spreadsheet patches that never write back leave the system of record wrong for everyone else. Shadow fixes feel productive and quietly poison downstream work.
Full Explanation
Shadow corrections in offline exports leave production systems unchanged while creating divergent local truths. Downstream processes that read the system of record continue to see defective values. Sustainable data quality requires writing approved corrections back through controlled channels and preventing the same defects at capture. Local-only fixes should be treated as an anti-pattern, not informal stewardship.