A public-health clinic app team completes and reviews stories every sprint, while leadership also keeps a twelve-month predictive baseline for a related facilities project. For the adaptive app work, which tracking emphasis is more appropriate?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
On iterative software, waiting a year to peek at progress is like driving with the windshield covered. Checking completed stories each sprint keeps the feedback loop alive. Save the long baseline focus for the predictive facilities track.
Full Explanation
Adaptive tracking values frequent empirical evidence—completed stories and reviewed increments—over relying solely on a distant predictive baseline. A twelve-month baseline may still exist for related predictive work, but it is not the primary progress signal for sprint-based delivery. CAPM associate depth stresses that frequent inspection beats deferred annual-only review for adaptive efforts.