Public works assumes vendors "guarantee" sensor truth, yet analysts still validate anomalies before publishing street-condition scores. Which veracity operations principle applies?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A vendor warranty is not a magic wand that makes every weird reading true. Analysts still poke the anomalies because veracity is partly on the people using the feed. Trust, then verify—especially before street scores go public.
Full Explanation
Veracity operations treat data quality as an ongoing responsibility of consumers and stewards, not something fully outsourced by buying a platform or signing a vendor guarantee. Anomaly validation before publishing street-condition scores exemplifies that shared duty. Ending checks at power-on or treating unchecked publication as proof of trust undermines integrity practices BDPC associates with trustworthy analysis.