A telecom provider wants its AI governance committee to include perspectives beyond technology. Which combination of functions would best reflect appropriate cross-functional representation?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Picture building a plane with only engineers in the room — nobody's asking you whether it's legal to fly or who's liable if it crashes. Your AI governance committee needs that same range at the table: business, legal, risk, and technology together, because no single function can show you the whole picture alone.
Full Explanation
A mix of business unit leaders, legal/compliance, risk, and technology gives the committee the range of perspectives needed to evaluate AI initiatives for business value, legal exposure, operational risk, and feasibility together — that's what cross-functional representation means. Limiting the committee to data science and engineering repeats the exact gap the telecom is trying to fix: technical expertise alone can't assess legal or business risk. Limiting it to finance controls the purse strings but not the risk, legal, or operational picture, so budget oversight isn't the same as governance. Limiting it to marketing addresses external communication but leaves the committee blind to compliance, risk, and technical feasibility questions that need to be resolved before communication is even relevant. The general principle: single-function committees, however well-intentioned, can't provide the range of judgment cross-functional governance is designed to deliver.