An outside researcher accesses a city system without permission, then claims an 'ethical' motive after publicly posting findings. How should the city treat that access?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Calling yourself an ethical hacker after hopping a fence does not unlock the gate after the fact. Real research gets a written invite—bug bounty, ROE, authorization—not a press-release halo.
Full Explanation
Claimed ethical motivations do not substitute for authorization. Organizations expect coordinated, authorized testing and responsible disclosure processes. Unauthorized access can still be unlawful even when a researcher later claims good intent, and public posting does not retroactively create rules of engagement or legal permission.