911 dispatch needs near-immediate failover capacity, while a rarely used archive system can tolerate long rebuild time. Which site strategy fits?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
911 can’t wait for someone to unpack servers from crates—that’s hot-site territory. Dusty archives can wake up slowly in a cold site. Swapping those priorities saves the wrong dollars.
Full Explanation
Hot sites maintain ready capacity for rapid failover and suit high-urgency services such as 911 dispatch. Cold sites provide space/infrastructure with longer recovery times appropriate for lower-urgency archives. Matching site type to recovery urgency is a core resilience decision. Marketing claims or single-generator local redundancy do not replace appropriate alternate-site strategy.