The county's pandemic-era continuity plan still lists 2020 remote and essential designations. How should the CHRO evaluate employee-safety and contingency readiness?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A 2020 continuity PDF is like last year's snow-route map after the roads were rebuilt. Who must be on site, who can work remote, and who is essential have probably changed. Living plans get a fresh look; dusty ones get people hurt or idle.
Full Explanation
Emergency-response and contingency plans must be living evaluations, not static artifacts from a prior emergency. Remote and essential designations drive who is exposed, who reports, and how services continue; they have to match current operations and sites. Fear of workforce reaction, archiving after the emergency order, or copying another county's plan does not produce that fit. The CHRO should refresh the designations and test the plan against today's structure.