A model recommends that the bridge-inspection team stop pairing “to go faster,” which conflicts with built-in quality. How should the SM/TC treat that advice?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
If a GPS says 'drive through the river, it is shorter,' the inspector still looks at the bridge. AI speed advice that kills pairing is a quality smell, not an order. Check it against built-in quality, then coach.
Full Explanation
Human-in-the-loop means evaluating AI recommendations against Lean-Agile and built-in quality practices such as pairing and collective ownership. Faster local coding that increases defects and knowledge silos is not flow. The SM/TC coaches that quality conversation at the team; it is not an RTE architecture ticket and not a people-manager decree. Blindly stopping pairing because a model said 'faster' fails the evaluation step.