An assessor stores cracked municipal PSKs from an authorized engagement in an unencrypted public repository. What data-handling failure does that represent?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Cracked city keys in a public repo is a second breach wearing a helper’s badge. Those secrets stay confidential engagement artifacts. Clever folder names do not make exposure okay.
Full Explanation
Recovered wireless credentials, handshakes, and PCAPs from authorized assessments are confidential client artifacts. Storing them in unencrypted public repositories creates secondary disclosure risk and violates professional data-handling expectations. Naming conventions or third-party grading myths do not justify public exposure of municipal secrets.