A school nutrition bot must follow USDA meal pattern rules rather than generic diet tips. How should prompts be adapted?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
School meals run on USDA patterns, not lifestyle-magazine tips. Stuff the prompt with domain examples that speak meal components and reimbursable patterns so the bot stays in that regulatory lane. Generic slogans or landscaping FAQs steer it off the tray line.
Full Explanation
A school nutrition bot must follow USDA meal pattern rules rather than generic diet tips, so prompts should include domain-specific examples grounded in those municipal and school meal components, reimbursable patterns, and age or grade group rules. Concrete USDA-aligned exemplars steer the model into the regulatory lane for cafeteria guidance that food-service staff can trust when answering parents and site managers. Celebrity diet slogans as the system prompt pull answers toward lifestyle content, not reimbursable meal patterns, and can contradict school nutrition policy. Banning all domain examples keeps the model maximally generic and more likely to invent non-compliant tips. Replacing nutrition policy with parks landscaping FAQs injects the wrong civic domain and wastes the context window on irrelevant municipal content. Exam caveat: examples must stay current with USDA updates and local school-board policy overlays; stale few-shots cause compliant-sounding but wrong answers on components such as milk substitutes or vegetable subgroups. Operational check: evaluate answers against a meal-pattern checklist, include negative examples of banned advice, re-approve prompts when USDA guidance changes, and involve the nutrition director in exemplar ratification before district-wide deployment.