A praxinoscope booth ran an NVIDIA AI Blueprint with VIA on short clips plus typed questions. Stewards now table clip id, question, and answer to scan misses. How should that table be treated?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Clip, question, answer in a tidy table is how you scan for misses. That is Domain 5 review of VIA outputs—leave the blueprint wiring alone for now.
Full Explanation
Tabulating clip id, question, and answer from an NVIDIA AI Blueprint with VIA run is Domain 5 analysis of video-plus-text outputs. The simple review table lets stewards scan misses without reopening blueprint wiring. Keep VIA as initials; the table is exploratory review of multimodal answers, not a software-customization reopen.
Treating the table as a Domain 4 customization reopen of VIA blueprint wiring fails because reviewing outputs is analysis; wiring changes require a separate implementation ticket after miss patterns justify them. Calling it an NCA-GENL LangChain application fails because this is multimodal VIA output review on NCA-GENM Domain 5, not a text-app nesting exam path. Inventing an expansion of the VIA initials in the report fails exam discipline: official materials keep VIA as initials and do not reward coined expansions.
Exam caveat: Domain 5 review tables analyze outputs; Domain 4 changes implement software. Do not conflate miss scanning with blueprint rewiring or with other certifications’ LLM-app patterns.
Operational check: export clip–question–answer rows from the praxinoscope booth; tag miss types; only escalate recurring miss classes to Domain 4 customization; keep reports using VIA initials for the civic multimodal review packet.