Over three weeks, automated evaluations show a gradual drop in tool-selection accuracy after several prompt and model-version changes, though infrastructure uptime remains 99.9%. Which monitoring concern is this, and what should you add?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Answer C. Multi-agent monitoring must track behavioral drift and quality regression, not just platform uptime. Keep evaluation baselines, bind scores to prompt/model versions, and auto-open remediation when tool-selection quality declines. NSG packet monitors and cert emails miss semantic quality. Turning evaluations off hides the regression.
Full Explanation
Correct answer: C. Skills include monitoring components for cross-agent coordination, behavioral drift, quality regression detection, and automated remediation for failure patterns. Uptime SLAs can be green while agent behavior silently degrades after prompt/model churn.
A is wrong: network monitors do not measure tool-choice quality.
B is wrong: certificate ops are necessary but orthogonal to agent behavioral drift.
D is wrong: evaluations are how you detect drift; disabling them removes the signal.
Implement continuous eval jobs, compare against golden sets, and gate or roll back model/prompt versions on regression.