Planning and zoning is reviewing guest access rules for an internal staff-only agent. Which statement is correct?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Staff-only agents aren't an open house for every guest account. Keep guest-open rules off an internal-only agent, full stop. You'll keep the public resident rules separate, and you'll keep guest-blocking and verified-staff limits on what's supposed to stay internal to your staff.
Full Explanation
Guest access rules that open the agent to external guests should not apply to an internal-only municipal staff agent. Planning and zoning must keep an internal staff-only agent aligned to internal audiences: B2B guests and external identities are out of scope when the agent is intentionally staff-only. Correct administration means choosing audience settings that match the agent’s purpose rather than accidentally inheriting guest-open sharing patterns from other collaboration scenarios.
Claiming that guest access rules for the public resident agent should not be separated from the internal-only municipal staff agent fails by concept— a public resident agent is intentionally guest-open while an internal-only staff agent is intentionally staff-only, so the staff agent must keep separate restrictive audience settings rather than inheriting guest access from the public agent. Claiming that guest access rules that block external guest access should not be retained on the internal-only municipal staff agent fails even more clearly for a staff-only agent because removing the block would expose internal review content to external guests. Claiming that guest access rules that limit the agent to verified staff should not be enforced on the internal-only municipal staff agent fails because configuring user and guest access is an explicit AB-900 administration topic; audience limits are configurable and meaningful, and only verified municipal staff can be allowed to invoke an internal-only agent.
Exam caveat: AB-900 Domain 3 includes guest access considerations for agents. Internal-only agents should not be opened by guest-friendly rules. Distinguish guest access (external identities) from internal group access, and do not treat shared rules with the public resident agent, dropping guest-blocking rules, or lifting verified-staff limits as reasons to ignore the stem’s internal-only constraint.
Operational check: Review the planning-and-zoning agent’s sharing and guest settings, confirm external guests are excluded, verify only the intended Entra groups of municipal staff can invoke, test with a guest account that access is denied, and document the internal-only classification so future makers do not “helpfully” widen guest access.
Prefer to study offline? Printable PDF study book + test engine ($7.50, unofficial). These questions stay free here.