A bank's AI Center of Excellence keeps its agent standards on a slide, but intake still accepts proposals that ignore those standards. What should the CoE change?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
A speed-limit sign that nobody checks at the gate does not slow a single car. You want the Center of Excellence to make intake enforce the standards, so a proposal that skips them cannot move ahead. Counting who opened the slide only proves the file was viewed.
Full Explanation
An AI Center of Excellence owns both the standard and the intake that applies it. A slide reviewers may ignore is not a standard in force, so the change is to make intake stop a proposal until the published checks are satisfied. Storing the slide in a shared library only moves the file, and intake can still accept work that skips it. Emailing the slide after intake has already accepted the proposal informs teams too late to change the decision. A count of who opened the slide measures curiosity, not compliance, and a widely viewed file can still be ignored on every request. Reviewers should see the standard named on the intake form itself, not only in a deck from a quarterly meeting. If a proposal needs an exception, the intake record should name the approver and when that exception ends, so the exception does not become a quiet bypass. Exam caveat: standards and intake are paired CoE duties, and either one without the other leaves the bank where it is now. Operational check: submit a test proposal that omits a required standard and confirm intake stops it, then submit one that meets the checks and confirm it proceeds.