Warehouse staff ask on-hand questions that a supply-chain copilot already answers from the live warehouse system. The copilot does not know the local rule for which trailer may wait in the yard. What should the architect do?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
You do not replace a clerk who already knows the stock count because of one yard rule. You keep the supply-chain copilot for on-hand questions and you extend it only for that rule. Last month's yard photos are not a live on-hand count.
Full Explanation
Extend the supply-chain copilot when it already covers the main job and the gap is one rule it does not know. On-hand questions are that main job, and the yard rule is the gap, so that copilot stays and the extension is only the yard rule. Replacing the supply-chain copilot with a custom model trained on last month's yard photographs throws away the live on-hand answers and memorizes a yard that has already changed. Pasting the full warehouse manual into a new agent and retiring the supply-chain copilot rebuilds the on-hand job inside a prompt and disconnects it from the warehouse system. Stopping on-hand answers until a foundation model is trained for every warehouse question on the floor blocks a working copilot for a rule the model project has not earned. The size of the gap is the yard rule, not the whole warehouse conversation. Exam caveat: the extension has to read the yard rule from a maintained source. A sentence buried in a prompt will go stale the same way a photo does. Operational check: ask an on-hand question and confirm the supply-chain copilot still answers it, then ask the yard question and confirm only the added rule is new.