A university admissions agent and a financial-aid agent both answer grant questions, each from its own copy of the aid policy. The copies now disagree, and students hear two awards for the same question. What should the architect change?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Two clerks reading two editions of the grant book will quote two awards. You have the admissions agent delegate aid questions to the financial-aid agent that holds the current policy. Telling both copies to sound confident only hides the drift.
Full Explanation
Aid questions have one owner. The admissions agent should delegate those questions to the financial-aid agent that holds the current policy, instead of both agents answering from private copies that have already drifted. Letting both agents keep their private policy copies and adding a line telling each one to answer with confidence preserves the two editions and adds a tone instruction that does not update either copy. Merging both agents into one prompt that pastes the two drifted copies into the instructions puts both stale texts in one place, so the model still has two policies to mix. Retiring both agents and publishing the older policy copy as the only remaining knowledge source picks the stale edition and removes the financial-aid agent that should own the answer. Delegation keeps one current policy and one agent responsible for it. Exam caveat: admissions can still greet the student and collect the question. It does not answer the grant amount from its own copy. Operational check: ask the admissions agent a grant question and confirm the reply comes from the financial-aid agent and matches the current policy, not the old admissions copy.