The NOC tries to filter municipal EVPN routes using only ordinary IPv4 prefix-lists and finds the policy ineffective. What concept should they apply?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
EVPN routes are not plain prefixes in a city phone book—you cannot catch them with a vanilla IPv4 prefix-list net. Use EVPN-aware policy that understands those NLRIs and attributes. Turning off MP-BGP to "make them look like inet" is the wrong kind of clever.
Full Explanation
EVPN uses distinct NLRI encoding (route types, RD, ESI, MAC/IP, MPLS/VXLAN labels, etc.). Effective filtering uses EVPN-aware policy constructs rather than assuming classic IPv4 prefix-list matching alone. EVPN can be filtered; MAC ads are not simply /32 inet prefixes; and disabling MP-BGP is not a valid way to coerce EVPN into inet unicast policy.