A single city IT organization owns the whole fabric but still separates production and development with different VRFs. What does this illustrate?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
One landlord, two locked wings. Even when the city is the only tenant of record, prod and dev still deserve separate VRFs so a lab typo cannot route into payroll. Ownership and isolation domains are related but not identical ideas.
Full Explanation
Single organizational ownership does not preclude logical multitenancy. Environment isolation with separate routing instances (prod vs dev) is a common, valid pattern on Junos QFX fabrics. It is still L3 tenant-style separation even though one IT team operates both. Forcing shared inet.0 or claiming VRFs require multiple legal entities misunderstands the objective.