Which statement best summarises how ownership and review responsibilities should function in an AI use case inventory?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Ownership isn't a one-time signature—it's a standing job. You and your reviewers keep entries updated, record decisions, and finish remediation while the use case is live.
Full Explanation
The correct statement is the one saying owners and reviewers stay accountable for keeping entries updated, recording decisions, and completing remediation actions while the use case is active. Continuous accountability for updates, decisions, and remediation keeps an inventory entry trustworthy across its active life. The statement saying owners are only responsible at initial approval is incorrect because treating approval as the end of the owner's role leaves the entry unmaintained afterwards. The statement saying reviewers exist only to check formatting is incorrect because reviewers must assess substance, such as risk and remediation status, not just formatting. The statement saying ownership and review are optional for low-risk use cases is incorrect because even low-risk use cases need minimum ownership and review to stay accurately classified. For the exam, describe ownership and review as continuous obligations tied to active status.