An administrator troubleshooting a pilot deployment discovers that each team involved followed a different approval process before the model was allowed to proceed. What underlying problem does that reveal?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
When each team invents its own approval path, you're seeing the result of no shared governance workflow. You need one defined approval process that everyone follows.
Full Explanation
The correct answer is the option stating that the organisation never defined a shared governance workflow, leaving teams to invent their own approval paths. When approval paths differ team to team, the root cause is almost always the absence of a defined, shared workflow that everyone is expected to follow. The option about the pilot's model being trained on inconsistent data across teams is incorrect because inconsistent training data is a data-quality issue, unrelated to how many approval processes exist. The option about deployment infrastructure not supporting multiple approval stages is incorrect because infrastructure limitations are a technical constraint, not the cause of process divergence. The option about the teams lacking the technical skill to build a model correctly is incorrect because skill level does not determine whether a shared approval workflow exists. For the exam, treat divergent approval paths as evidence that a governance workflow was never defined, not as a technical fault.