The dependency maps the assistant generated during analysis are being ignored by the team, a choice the design review flags. What is the risk?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
The dependency map is the evidence for where the seams actually are. Ignore it and you're guessing. You'll draw component boundaries without regard to real coupling.
Full Explanation
The option saying that ignoring generated recommendations and dependency maps means component boundaries may be drawn without regard to real coupling is correct. The dependency map produced during analysis shows which parts of the application are tightly coupled; disregarding it risks selecting boundaries that cut across real dependencies.
The option saying there is no risk because dependency maps are only advisory suggestions is incorrect because the map is a direct input to sound component selection, not an optional extra.
The option saying dependency maps are useful only after modular components have already been generated is incorrect because the map's value is in shaping selection before generation, not reviewing it afterward.
The option saying ignoring the maps only affects documentation quality is incorrect because poor boundaries have functional consequences, not merely documentation ones.
For the exam, generated recommendations and dependency maps should inform component selection, not be set aside.