How do CODEOWNERS and required reviews commonly work together in a governed repository?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
CODEOWNERS maps paths to people or teams, and branch protection or rulesets can require those owners to approve. You get path-based governance, not autopilot merge robots or a CI off switch. Keep the file accurate or you create rubber-stamp bottlenecks.
Full Explanation
The correct answer is that required review rules can require approval from code owners for paths they own. This ensures domain experts review sensitive directories before merge when rulesets or branch protection demand it. The claim that CODEOWNERS always merges PRs without human approval is false because CODEOWNERS does not auto-merge. The claim that CODEOWNERS disables all CI workflows is false because CI is independent. The claim that CODEOWNERS replaces the need for authentication is false because authentication still applies. Maintain CODEOWNERS with teams, not only individuals, handle renames promptly, and avoid unreachable owners that block delivery for the whole organization.