A latency-sensitive CAD integration between city design systems needs private connectivity and carefully sized bandwidth. What network provisioning focus is required?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Heavy CAD chatter wants a private, well-sized pipe—not hoping the public internet feels like a quiet Sunday. Match connectivity type, bandwidth, and latency to the job.
Full Explanation
Private connectivity options with bandwidth and latency sized to the CAD workload are the network provisioning focus for latency-sensitive integrations between city design systems that cannot rely on best-effort public paths alone. Consumer residential Wi-Fi as the sole interconnect fails enterprise private connectivity and bandwidth planning. Public internet only with no bandwidth planning fails the latency and predictability requirements stated. DNS TXT records substituted for private transport fail because DNS metadata is not a private data plane. Exam caveat: provision-time network design includes connectivity type plus sized bandwidth/latency—not DNS tricks or consumer access methods. Operational check: select dedicated/VPN private paths as appropriate, capacity-plan CAD bursts, measure latency SLOs, and document failover if the primary civic interconnect degrades. In municipal platform operations, record the chosen control and the rejected alternatives in the change record so future on-call engineers understand the failure modes avoided for citizen services. Re-check the decision after the next provider feature change or compliance update to ensure the same answer still holds for the city's estate.