Meridian Regional Airlines' finance leadership must approve continued capital investment in the cargo-and-passenger demand-forecasting model. They are not data scientists and have asked the AI project manager to explain why the model raised its forecast for a particular route by 18%. What is the most appropriate way to communicate this?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Finance leaders don't need a matrix dump, they need the story in plain business language: what changed, why it matters, and how sure the model is. That's how you communicate an AI decision to stakeholders who are approving money, not code.
Full Explanation
The correct answer is to explain the increase in business terms: naming the observed factors behind it, such as a competitor's reduced capacity on the route, and stating the model's confidence level, so finance leadership can weigh the forecast against a capital decision without needing to understand the model's internals. Communicating AI decision processes to stakeholders in language suited to their role is a named Trustworthy AI task, and a capital-approval briefing is exactly the setting it exists for. Presenting raw weight matrices fails because it hands data-science artifacts to a non-technical audience who cannot act on them, satisfying transparency in form but not in substance — technically 'available' information that nobody in the room can actually use is not real communication. Asserting the forecast is correct 'because the model has historically been accurate' substitutes a track-record appeal for an actual explanation of this specific change, which does not help leadership evaluate whether this particular 18% jump reflects a real market signal or a modeling anomaly worth investigating before approving spend. Declining to explain at all treats a legitimate capital-approval question as out of scope, when communicating AI decisions to the stakeholders who fund and govern the project is precisely the PM's job — a leadership team asked to approve continued investment is entitled to an explanation they can actually use.