A township compares buying five years of servers versus paying only for what it uses after moving a GIS viewer to AWS. Which cloud value idea best matches the second approach?
Select an answer to reveal the explanation.
Short Explanation
Buying five years of iron for a GIS viewer is like stocking a warehouse for a weekend festival. Paying for what you use means the meter runs when maps are served and idle time does not burn a giant capital check. That cost flexibility is a core cloud value.
Full Explanation
A foundational AWS Cloud value is shifting from large upfront hardware purchases toward paying for consumed resources, which improves cost flexibility for workloads such as a GIS viewer. Permanently oversizing idle on-premises servers, forcing CapEx per compute hour, or insisting on owning every disk to avoid variable billing works against that model.